Ben Johns & Simone Jardim’s Hyperion CFS 16 Swift Paddle: A Comprehensive Review for All Players

Introducing the New Joola Hyperion CFS 16 Swift: A Closer Look

Joola’s launch of the original Ben Johns Hyperion CFS 16 made quite a splash in the pickleball community. Players enjoyed its features, but feedback indicated some concerns—particularly about its weight. Specifically, many felt the paddle was too head-heavy, which might deter some from embracing its advantages.

After hearing the voices of fans and critics alike, Joola responded by creating a more balanced version, the Ben Johns Hyperion CFS 16 Swift. This updated model weighs half an ounce less than its predecessor, which may significantly influence its performance. As an experienced player and enthusiast, I was intrigued by how this weight reduction might enhance or diminish the paddle’s capabilities. I set out to thoroughly review the Swift to evaluate how it stood against its predecessor and competitors.

The Newcomer vs. The Original: What’s Different?

With the release of the hyper-light Swift model, Joola did not just stop with Ben Johns’ paddle. They also introduced similar versions with Simone Jardim’s signature—both the CFS 16 and the 16 Swift. The new models maintain most of the original designs, yet feature different aesthetics and a slightly smaller handle. While the design changes are appealing, the real question remains: will these new paddles maintain the same stellar performance?

Going into my review, I had several important questions:

1. Will the Swift still retain the head-heavy feel, even with a lighter build?
2. Will its performance match the magic touch of the original?
3. Is it worth the price tag, especially when compared to Joola’s Vision CGS 16?

After two weeks of playing and practicing with the Joola Hyperion CFS 16 Swift, I’m ready to share my findings and insights based on my experience.

Weight Matters: A New Perspective

The most noticeable change when using the Swift is its weight. The reduction is palpable and makes a significant difference in how the paddle feels during play. Hitting backhand volleys felt far less cumbersome, and I noticed an easier time maintaining control in fast exchanges. However, while its lighter weight is a clear benefit, I initially believed this improvement might be the only perk over the original model.

One of my biggest hopes was for the Swift to carry over the original’s plush feel, which combined softness with a certain pop. Unfortunately, this wasn’t the case. Instead, the Swift felt firmer and less forgiving on contact, which made it harder to achieve the same level of control. This left me wanting more from the paddle.

Assessing Power and Spin: A Mixed Bag

Despite its lighter nature, the Swift loses some stability compared to the original Hyperion CFS 16, though it remains competitive among other elongated 16 mm paddles. Spin capabilities and power levels were decent, yet oddly not as robust as the original model. In comparison to similar paddles—such as the Electrum Model E and the Joola Vision CGS 16—the Swift can deliver more power but lacks the finesse of its predecessor.

This newfound power comes at a cost. While the Vision CGS 16 offers a softer feel overall, it allows for better touch and control, which I appreciated more, especially in fast-paced scenarios. My thought process? If the original was too heavy for you, the Vision CGS 16 is likely to be a better fit than the Swift, which seems to miss the mark.

Decoding the Feel: Performance Insights

The most pressing question remained: Did the Swift retain the enchanting feel and responsiveness of the original Hyperion CFS 16? Unfortunately, the answer leaned towards a resounding no. My playtesting revealed a strikingly different sensation, causing confusion over its performance.

While I enjoyed using the Swift for dinking and softer exchanges, the paddle shifted into a stiffer handle zone with faster balls or more forceful swings. This change robbed the Swift of the unique touch and control I had grown to love in its predecessor. I found myself struggling with serves, drives, and resets during practice sessions, feeling disconnected from my shots.

In contrast, the original Hyperion CFS 16 provided a consistent soft touch that allowed for an incredible blend of power and control. The Swift simply didn’t deliver that experience. As my practice period unfolded, I became more disheartened, eager for two weeks to conclude so I could move on.

Weighing Cost vs. Quality: Is It Worth It?

When comparing the specifications of the Swift against Joola’s Vision CGS 16, the similarities are hard to ignore. The Vision’s average weight stands slightly lighter at 7.9 ounces—just a tenth of an ounce beneath the Swift. Both paddles share the same core thickness, shape, and face style. However, where they diverge is in their features, with the Vision lacking certain technologies like the carbon-forged handle and foam inlays surrounding the edge.

This raises a vital question: Is the Swift worth the extra $50 compared to the Vision CGS 16? Based on my experience, I’d have to reply with a firm no.

The Vision’s softer touch made it feel far more consistent than the Swift. If you’re trading power for a more balanced experience, the Vision CGS 16 is the far superior option. Sure, the Swift gains minimal power in certain conditions, but it’s not enough to sway my overall recommendation.

For players who don’t want to compromise on softness and control but still want a kick of power, the Diadem Warrior Edge offers a solid alternative. Both the Vision and the Edge provide a superior experience at lower prices, making them more appealing for discerning players.

Final Thoughts: Finding Your Paddle Match

In summary, while the Joola Hyperion CFS 16 Swift does offer a lighter and more manageable alternative to the original model, it sacrifices critical elements like feel, control, and overall performance. If you’re searching for balance, the Vision CGS 16 stands out as a stronger choice. Those eyeing a blend of lightweight and spin should consider alternatives like the Diadem Warrior Edge instead of the Swift.

Let’s face it; preferences vary from player to player. It’s essential to try out multiple paddles to find the best fit for your unique playing style. Keep experimenting and find your winning combination!

Heads up, team! If you snag some gear through our Mystiltein links, we might score a tiny commission—think of it as our victory dance! This little boost helps us keep the awesome, free journalism you cheer for coming your way! No need to fret; our game plan for editorial content stays as fair as a referee with a whistle. Want to throw us a high five? You can do that right here!